Wednesday, August 5, 2015

Just Goes to Show How Easy It Is For Blacks To Feign Outrage Over Just About Anything

Recently a popular magazine ran an article about hair styles for summer. Depicted in the story was a white girl wearing a hair style that set off the black women on that sewer known as Tumblr,  and lit up "Black Twitter" calling out the tutorial for being racially insensitive. 

In this day and age, certain minorities just look for a reason to be outraged at what they refer to as cultural appropriation. They called the hair style, one made increasingly popular in the past by movie stars such as a young Meg Ryan, an appropriation of their black culture. 
"It is not cool for white women to wear black hairstyles. It is not cute. It is not flattering. When white women wear black hairstyles, it's a slap in the face to black women..." 
"There are so many reasons why it's not okay for white women to  wear styles traditionally worn by black women, including Afros, braids and dreadlocks. Black hair is not just hair. There's history and context tied to these styles that cannot be ignored, a historical legacy forever linked to the ongoing cultural remnants of slavery and institutional racism....." 
"A white person who wears these styles dismisses that context and turns black hair into a novelty, a parody, a subtle form of blackface." 
Bitches Please! 

The hair style worn in the picture is 'Corkscrew Curls', or as they call it these days, a 'Twist Out'. It is a style once not uncommon to women throughout history with coarse hair and natural curls, and popular with many young girls I've known of Jewish heritage. The style goes back to ancient times. IT'S NOT AN AFRO!

As for cornrows, the first depiction of this hair style is from the art of the Sumerian and Akkadian cultures, both older civilizations than the High Egyptians (who BTW were a mixed race culture, not black). And hair braids are depicted in the oldest art of almost every culture in the world.  As for dreadlocks, you should read this

Most modern African American cultural references for the most part are inventions of 1960's anti-European Afro-centric scholars who managed to connect anything and everything to slavery and racism. Their lies and propaganda have made it into higher learning by that great institution of affirmative action. 

So now, my outraged protectors of black culture, explain this to me....

Jay Z's Breeder Beyonce Knowles and the Butt Ugly Talentless Nicki Minaj
Funny, I have never heard anyone complain white culture is being hi-jacked by these people, wearing their colored and straighten white hair styles and  French designed clothing.  Should I be equally outraged at these displays as disrespecting my race and culture?

No, because I understand well that the average black women is at a disadvantage, seeing most of the male species of all races generally find black females physically unattractive. 

As for why any white women would want to wear cornrows or dreadlocks is beyond me. They look clownish and incredibly nasty. Yeah, I said it!  And as for my 2 cents on the matter, your silly outrage over hair styles can be reserved for your black culture's own internal consumption, and for your white PC friends who bow at your every disgust with America, because I think it's just more racist nonsense.  

Obama Signs On With Newest UN Socialist Scam

It's The People's Agenda
" We will seek to build strong economic foundations for all our countries.
This will only be possible if wealth is shared and income inequality is addressed. "

It seems the United Nations has come to the realization that the Global Warming scam they so fervently push is coming apart at the seams and has come up with an alternative, more compassionate sounding new idea to rape the developed world of it's ill gotten wealth gained through it's greed, and redistribute it to the ignorant backward cultures of the world. 

Because to a good socialist, we're not equal until we are all equally poor. (the term 'equal' shall be redefined when necessary)

Progtards Today:
A month ago, the United Nations (UN) Secretary General stated that the Obama administration was set to sign an international agreement eradicating global poverty.  While the exact means of achieving this lofty goal were a little sketchy, the fact that sustainable development was going to be the main mode of transportation was all too clear. 
And for those of us who have been studying Obama’s green agenda for many years, seeing the term “sustainable development” is enough to set off Marxist alarm bells so loud it would even cause the angels in heaven to cover their ears.  Even so, without a link to the actual document, my hopes of exposing the true collective agenda of the UN agreement was slim at best…until now.....
Monday the UN announced that all 193 member states, which includes the United States, have reached an agreement on new global development goals to eradicate global poverty.  According to the UN goals titled “Transforming our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development” they “encompasses a universal, transformative and integrated agenda that heralds an historic turning point for our world.
But for Americans, that turning point the UN so gloriously celebrates will takes us on a path most of us have no interest in going down.  One which not only openly promotes a Socialist agenda, but forces us to embrace it by 2030. Here is the proof in black and white..... 

Tuesday, August 4, 2015

The Illusion of Government

Every year thousands of Americans make pilgrimages to Washington DC to marvel at statues, historic re-enactments and to reminisce on the over blown accomplishments of our public leaders. Some like, Senator Chuck Schumer, have been a fixture on Capitol Hill for decades while brow beating the public with their over inflated sense of self importance. How is it that these politicians enter their offices making ends meet on government salaries and, yet like Harry Reid, end up being millionaires after several terms?  We never hear any elected official mention in today’s public arena that they are a servant of the people when in fact they are. However, you would never know this by the way they enact unpopular bills and laws that simply benefit special interest groups or completely contradict the vast majority of opinion.

The illusion of government is essential in dazzling the probing eye of the public who is easily impressed by the seeming credentials of the cult of personality leadership continually canonized by the state controlled media. In this single element of deception the illusion intentionally propagated by the government becomes the opiate of the masses even in failure the apathetic public and easily swayed voters will continually elect the same corrupt leaders who failed again and again and again thanks to the regurgitated rhetoric. 

One truth that is steadily denied and lost upon the people with consistency is that the federal government makes absolutely nothing. It taxes, regulates, and confiscates from the people and from private sector business in order to perpetuate itself. It is the private enterprise that generates an economy and supports society, not the government, yet they would have us believe the other way.  

When President Obama tells a TV audience on the John Stewart Show that the IRS did not cause a scandal despite evidence to the contrary, the lie reassures the simple minds. When the president blatantly defies the US Constitution and there is no response from a politicized Justice Department you have a compromised government from within.

As our federal government regulates and enacts laws that deprive us of our freedoms and allow our sovereignty to be stolen by hostile foreign influences right out in the open. In the very midst of this coup on the American way of life, the dull minded electorate, the useful idiots of liberty robbing sabotage served up by the Obama regime still refuse to see the illusion for what it really is. The illusion is far more seductive then the reality of destruction that has been waged against a teetering America. A smooth talking president is much more acceptable then a rational appraisal of the inherent failures and blatant violations of the administration that this cult of personality represents.

So the rats scurry around and the sheep go on grazing as the nation continues to topple.

Happy Birthday Mr. President

In honor of the 54th birthday of our self proclaimed 
4th bestest President ever of America, we present
an updated repost from the dark, dank archives
of one of our reader favorites from the past:

(With Sincere Apologies to Ralph Edwards, original
MC of the 1950's television show 'This is Your Life')

 This is Your Life: Barack Obama 

We Begin at the Beginning......

Born Barry Soetoro
August 4, 1961.......Somewhere?

Monday, August 3, 2015

2016 Dems Need a Mythical War on Voting Rights

When the Voting Rights Act was adopted in 1965, America was a segregated nation. Many states, especially in the South, had discriminatory voting laws that worked to prevent African-Americans from voting. Despite furious opposition from the Jim Crow caucus within the Democratic Party, a bipartisan Congressional majority enacted the law. That began the process of redressing this historic injustice that was part of the unfinished legacy of the Civil War that had concluded a century earlier.
We’ve come a long way since then. Jim Crow is but an awful memory and blacks not only vote in most of the South at the same rates that whites do but also can look to a large Congressional Black Caucus whose existence is largely due to subsequent court interpretations of the Act that created minority-majority districts. But for the left, it’s always 1965 and a revival of Jim Crow is just around the corner. That’s the gist of the cover story of last Sunday’s New York Times Magazine, “A Dream Undone,” that takes it as a given that minority voting rights are not only under attack but about to disappear.
That this is palpably false is self-evident since efforts to single out blacks and prevent them from voting simply do not exist anywhere in the nation. Why then devote space to a nonexistent problem? 
The Times is singing from the Democratic Party hymnal heading into 2016 as Hillary Clinton attempts to scare African-American voters who are somewhat apathetic about her candidacy into turning out in the same numbers they did for Barack Obama. But if Democrats want to frighten their party’s base into thinking Jim Crow is on its way back, they’ll have to do better than arcane disputes about voter ID or early voting laws.
The conceit of Jim Rutenberg’s lengthy essay is that there is a clear continuum between the death rattle of the segregationists south that began to die in the early 1960s and today’s Republican Party.  One of the greatest victories of the struggle for Civil Rights was the way it transformed the white South from a bastion of racism to one in which racial equality was taken as a given Race exists as an issue in the America of 2015, but comparisons with 1965 aren’t merely misleading, they are flat out falsehoods. That is especially true in the South, where blacks vote and hold office in numbers that are largely commensurate with their share of the overall population. 

It's Gonna Be a Big F**kin' Deal....

A Good Monday Morning

Saturday, August 1, 2015

First Lady Will Return to Humiliating Nation's Youth

While gearing up for another taxpayer paid grand vacation on Martha's Vineyard, the first lady took time to announced she will pay visits to school lunchrooms again this fall to humiliating the fat kids of America after they've "stuffed their chubby little faces with candy and goodies over the long summer vacation break."

The First Lady vowed to continue to pursue her campaign to stamp out childhood obesity and rid the nation of fat kids even if it starves and pisses off an entire generation. "These are kids who stuff there faces with Mickey-D's French fries and Big Mac's and aren't even healthy enough to out-run a Republican pervert."

Threatening to slam children's foreheads into the lunch table is one of the First Lady's most affective communication tools when discussing proper eating habits

What Voters See in Donald Trump:

"Trump's rise is not due to his supporters' anger at government. It is a gesture of contempt for government, for the men and women in Congress, the White House, the agencies. It is precisely because people have lost their awe for the presidency that they imagine Mr. Trump as a viable president. ...
Mr. Trump's supporters like that he doesn't in the least fear the press, doesn't get the dart-eyed, anxious look candidates get. He treats reporters with courtesy until he feels they're out of line, at which point he calls them stupid. They think he'll do that with Putin. His insult of John McCain didn't hurt him, and not because his supporters have any animus for Mr. McCain. They just saw it as more proof Mr. Trump will take the bark off anyone. ...
Trump's power is not name ID. He didn't make his name in this cycle or the last, he's been around 35 years. He's made an impression." — Peggy Noonan, The Wall Street Journal

A New Theory on Why Men Love Boobies

Presented by DMF as a Public Service and to Help
in Furthering the Knowledge of Science  

Figure 1 - Boobies

Why do straight men devote so much head-space to those big, bulbous bags of fat drooping from women's chests? Scientists have never satisfactorily explained men's curious breast fixation (see figure #1), but now, a neuroscientist has struck upon an explanation that he says "just makes a lot of sense."

 Larry Young, a professor of psychiatry at Emory University who studies the neurological basis of complex social behaviors, thinks human evolution has harnessed an ancient neural circuit that originally evolved to strengthen the mother-infant bond during breast-feeding, and now uses this brain circuitry to strengthen the bond between couples as well. The result? Men, like babies, love breasts.

When a woman's nipples are stimulated during breast-feeding, the neurochemical oxytocin, otherwise known as the "love drug," floods her brain, helping to focus her attention and affection on her baby. But research over the past few years has shown that in humans, this circuitry isn't just reserved for exclusive use by infants.

Recent studies have found that nipple stimulation enhances sexual arousal in the great majority of women, and it activates the same brain areas as vaginal stimulation. When a sexual partner touches, massages or nibbles a woman's breasts, Young said, this triggers the release of oxytocin in the woman's brain, just like what happens when a baby nurses. But in this context, the oxytocin focuses the woman's attention on her sexual partner, strengthening her desire to bond with this person.