They are taught to believe the US stole Mexican land. It's called the Reconquista.
They believe in a fairytale of a magical Aztecan land called Aztlan.
They've been pumped full of this garbage by a fascist named Jose Vasconcelos who was in charge of culture and education after
the revolution. Vasconcelos called for the extermination of Anglos and
capitalism.
Their goal is to populate the SW states, drain the US
of its resources through welfare, and then reclaim it for Mexico through
violent uprising.
Kids, wearing sombreros and ironically holding signs reading “No
hate,” screamed “F*ck you!” repeatedly at the passing motorists. One of the children in the center of the action can be seen holding a Bernie Sanders sign.
Hillary Clinton campaign signs could also be seen in the crowd.
Obama has budgeted $17,613 for each of the estimated 75,000
Central American teens expected to illegally cross into the United
States this year, $2,841 more than the average annual Social Security
retirement benefit, according to a new report.
The total bill to taxpayers: $1.3 billion in benefits to
"unaccompanied children," more than double what the federal government
spent in 2010, according to an analysis of the administration's programs
for illegal minors from the Center for Immigration Studies. The average Social Security retirement benefit is $14,772.
Multiculturalism. It does not work, it has never worked, and cannot work. It's pointless antagonism without end, and benefits only the leftist political class. If it weren't all about tearing down American thought and values, proponents wouldn't attempt to turn everything into the hell holes they came from in the first place.
I have no idea what to make of this. The Huffington Post is arguing that Americans have no legal right to shoot a violent attacker because it violates the criminal's right to a fair trial. I feel confident in saying this is by far the dumbest attempt to subvert our gun ownership rights ever and that’s saying a lot considering how insanely stupid gun grabbers are.
Justin Curmi is a dyslexic guy with a degree in philosophy. According to his bio he is, “A blogger that seeks to engage people in thought and conversation through presenting new views to matters, new or old.” Writing for The HuffPo, he presented one hell of a view concerning our right to not be murdered by a maniac killer.
Oddly enough, this thing starts out very un-HuffPosty by acknowledging that the 2nd Amendment does protect private gun ownership:
"The Second Amendment is highly contested. There is no doubt that people do have the right to carry and have a stockpile of guns (“the right of the people to keep and bear arms”) and a state has the right to organize a well-regulated Militia. But, the main issue is on the right to self-defend with a firearm."
It’s still worded sarcastically, but that does seem like the author reluctantly agrees with the people’s right to keep and bear arms. Now here is where things become unhinged:
"The main problem with the notion of self-defense is it imposes on justice, for everyone has the right for a fair trial. Therefore, using a firearm to defend oneself is not legal because if the attacker is killed, he or she is devoid of his or her rights."
And if you thought that was idiotic, check out the other reasons why the author thinks we can’t use guns in self-defense: - READ MORE
