WAPO: It's a Lie That the Democrat Race is Between Moderates and Socialists. Let's Face It, They're All a Bunch of Radical Socialists.

The Washington Post editorial board is fed up with all of you deplorables talking about the Democrat primary as some sort of civil war between the far left and centrists and point out that the entire field is chock full of socialists. They say "centrists" and "the left."  But "the left" is just a polite euphemism for radical socialists. IT HAS become an unchecked assumption about the Democratic presidential race:

"The candidates are fighting an ideological war between "left" and "center." This narrative is false, and it is hardly benign. It minimizes the bold policy ambitions of those in the mislabeled "centrist" lane and falsely characterizes those on the left flank as braver or more committed to reform.

Then there are the policy moves that practically all Democrats agree on: giving legal safe harbor to the young immigrants known as "dreamers"; reviving and expanding President Barack Obama's climate regulations; reengaging with Iran; raising the minimum wage; keeping abortion legal; cracking down on guns. They want maximum government control in achieving their goals...

In fact, every major Democratic candidate is running on an agenda to the left of Mr. Obama's."

The Washington Post will renounce this op-ed and claim it didn't mean what it plainly means when it becomes inconvenient in the general election, and they pivot to claiming the candidate they've admitted is a radical socialist is now a "centrist moderate." But for now, they've admitted it.

This morning, James Carville once again offered his own warnings about Bernie Sanders.  On today's 'Covfefe with Squinty & Meat Puppet', Carville spoke in literally apocalyptic terms, warning that the Democrat Party is that if Democrats nominate another Jeremy Corbyn [i.e., Bernie Sanders], it's going to be the "end of days."

 

[TownHall]

[Ace HQ]

~ Thank You WHATFINGER NEWS for the Linkage! ~