Your Beloved Blog Editrix Turns Things Over To You, The Readers.
Please Keep Weapons In Plain Sight At All Times.
This Week Your Open Thread Sponsored By:
"Taxpayers should be horrified that the Norwalk-La Mirada USD is considering a partnership with Planned Parenthood, Parents Defending Education president and founder Nicole Neily told Fox News. The fact that the contract specifically notes that ‘under California law minors have the right to consent to reproductive health services without parental consent or notification’ is appalling in and of itself.
Referring to the possibility of students being referred to off-campus clinics for “services not offered,” Neily continued, “Other Planned Parenthood clinics do provide gender-affirming hormone therapy, so there is a very real possibility students will be referred off-campus to receive this treatment – again, with zero parental notification.
To add insult to injury, there is no way for parents to EVER obtain this information, as the contract asserts that all medical records are to be maintained by Planned Parenthood...."
Hypothesis 1: Dogs with White-sounding names will have shorter times to adoption, compared to dogs with names that are not perceived as White. Dogs with Black- and Hispanic-sounding names will have longer times to adoption, compared to dogs with names that are not perceived as Black or Hispanic.
Hypothesis 2: The effects of racialized names will be stronger among pit bulls than among other breeds. Pit bulls with White-sounding names will have shorter times to adoption, compared to pit bulls with names that are not perceived as White. Pit bulls with Black- and Hispanic-sounding names will have longer times to adoption, compared to pit bulls with names that are not perceived as Black or Hispanic.
Hypothesis 3: Nonhuman names will be associated with shorter times to adoption, compared to dogs with names that are perceived as human.
"Fascinating research that supports the resiliency of racialized names and the pervasiveness of anti-Blackness. Must read work."
Regardless, this ridiculous, scientific-y “study” within the no-longer hallowed halls of academia is just one more effort to racialize every aspect of America that race-obsessed useful idiots eagerly vomit on America.
~ No Tuxedos Required ~
"The comparison between a gasoline vehicle and an electric one is really a comparison between burning gasoline or a mix of coal and natural gas to move the vehicle."
And have you considered the reliability of EVs — which cost considerably more than gas-powered vehicles — in comparison to gas-powered cars?. J.D. Power has — as noted by the Federalist: "Owners of electric or hybrid vehicles cite more problems than do owners of gas-powered vehicles. The latter vehicles average 175 problems per 100 vehicles (PP100), hybrids average 239 PP100, and battery-powered cars, and plug-in hybrid vehicles have more quality issues than gas-powered vehicles."
"Given the average cost of an electric car is roughly $60,000, about $20,000 more than the cost of a gas-powered car, it seems owners of EVs didn’t get the value they deserve."
First Speechwriter: “We need to figure out a way to make all these Hispanic people we’re lumping together under ‘Latinx’ feel unique.”
Second Speechwriter: “That’s like Mexican or something, right? Don’t they all eat tacos?”
First Speechwriter: “Yeah, but… needs more oomph… BREAKFAST tacos! They’ll eat that up. And they'll swoon at Dr. Jill's progressive vision!