Saturday, October 27, 2012

Was it Valerie Jarrett Again?

"No one at any level in the CIA told anybody not to help those in need; claims to the contrary are simply inaccurate. ” - CIA Director David Petraeus 
"So who in the government did tell “anybody” not to help those in need? Someone decided not to send in military assets to help those Agency operators. Would the secretary of defense make such a decision on his own? No." 
"It would have been a presidential decision. There was presumably a rationale for such a decision. What was it? When and why—and based on whose counsel obtained in what meetings or conversations—did President Obama decide against sending in military assets to help the Americans in need?"- The Weekly Standard  
[SNIP]
Could it have been the same Rasputin Jarrett who convinced the Child Emperor to delay taking the Bin Laden shot. Hmmmm?
__________________________________________

3 comments:

  1. Ultimately, the person who made the decision is irrelevant. It is the president who is responsible for any decision made by his administration. He appoints the people who support him. He must take the fall. This fall is long overdue. This man is the most incompetent, unprepared, lazy, and intellectually challenged man to ever hold the office of President of the United States.

    ReplyDelete
  2. The White House has been changed into a very strange place.

    ReplyDelete
  3. The reason for the coverup is easy to discern, based on recognition of a pattern which reasserts itself within the Administration:

    Obama says Bin Laden is dead, therefore, Al'Qaeda is, too. And I did that.

    Obama says Mubarak is gone, therefore, Egypt is a functioning, pluralistic, democracy on the Western Model. And I did that.

    Obama says Qadaffi is dead, therefore, Libya is now a democracy and pacified. And I did that.

    But then, along comes some towelheaded morons with a different agenda, who don't give a s*it about what Obama claims to have done, or how he's done it, they just want us dead, no matter how. They manage to kill four Americans with the Military and CIA and perhaps even the President watching it on television, and in so doing, they have sent the unmistakable message: You haven't done anything, As*hole: we're still here.

    This basically equates to Obama's "Mission Accomplished" moment, and if there's anything The O-man wishes to avoid, it is criticism and embarrassment, especially of the sort he and his minions in Leftard Land once leveled at his predecessor. The comparison to GWB would have KILLED this egomaniac. The problem, to the Obamatards, isn't that four Americans are dead on the Anniversary of a Great National Disaster, but that a month before the election, Obama would have had this happen on his watch when he said it was impossible.

    It's now very funny, sort of, in retrospect, to remember the president talking about aircraft carriers in the last debate, for that was the site of GWB's greatest message fail ever.

    The scramble was on to find SOMETHING to blame the attack on that did not invalidate the always-weak intellectual and political basis upon which Obama's Terror War and Middle East policy were always formed. Finding that task impossible, some junior staffer in the White House probably came across the YouTube video while surfing for porn, and concocted the sort of conspiracy theory you usually ascribe to a seven year old who just got caught trying to flush daddy's good watch down the toilet "by accident".

    The trouble with the theory was that no one believed it from the beginning, because no matter how much you insist that an ox is a mallard, very few people can ignore the evidence to the contrary.

    They got stuck making a stretch in trying to salvage something of Obama's 'legacy', and it bit them in the ass. It speaks volumes about what sort of peopel run this country.

    ReplyDelete

ALL ANONYMOUS COMMENTS GO STRAIGHT TO THE SPAM FILTER.