On Thursday, at the National Prayer Breakfast, President Obama, with a straight face and in his best preacher pontification mode, put forth the idea that there is a moral equivalence between the brutal murderers of ISIS and the Christian Crusaders, among other allusions in history, which, in fact, are not comparable.
Obama then
flashed forward from the Christian Crusades of 900 to 1100 years ago in
the Holy Land to make his point more meaningful and timely in more
recent events. Obama then gratuitously threw in the religious
Inquisition in Europe and then moved to the period of American slavery
and Jim Crow laws to further his argument that we're all imperfect and
perhaps we should not judge ISIS on a religious basis, but rather on the
basis of a political ideology. Its's hard to determine what point
Obama was making with these later historical allusions, since it was
just so much drivel.
Obama's historical
delusion of moral equivalence swept reality under the carpet despite the
hundreds of millions of Muslims today that actually support in part or
in whole, what goals and objectives ISIS is trying to achieve through
their inhuman savagery.
It was obvious that Obama was
simply engaging in a polemical argument of equivalency to give, albeit
false, credence to his argument in separating ISIS from Islam. Of
course Obama never said that the analogy he put forth was really a moral
equivalence between the two movements, since the Christian Crusades
were, indeed, based upon religious grounds and his claim is that ISIS is
a political ideology, but that did not prevent Obama from trying to
make that ludicrous comparison.
Obama's
equivalence argument falls apart from the very beginning because he has
repeatedly said the ISIS is not a religious movement under the banner of
Islam, but is a perverted political movement hiding behind the religion
of Islam. So Obama's attempt at moral equivalency between the
religious crusades of the Christians and the actions of ISIS, falls
apart by his own definition of ISIS as a political ideology, rather than
as being a movement influenced by Islam, the so called religion of
peace.
This disparity in Obama's logic will,
unfortunately, fall upon the deaf ears and deluded minds of the ignorant
and stupid, who cannot see the fallacy of his perverted argument and
will buy his bullshit lock, stock and barrel.
It's
argued by some that Obama must be a stealth Muslim, since he supports
Muslims over Christians. I don't think Obama is a Muslim or a
Christian. How can a person sit in a pew in the Church of Hate lead
by the Rev. Jeremiah Wright, who preached the Marxist secular religion
of Black Nationalism, rather than any known Christian Protestant sect
and claim be a Christian? Forget about the fact that Obama has failed
to attend any church in over 6 years in office. So where does that
leave Obama?
I believe that Obama at his core
is a political secularist with no deep belief in any organized
religion. Obama is an intransigent political ideologue, who merely
uses religion as he finds it necessary to accomplish his political
goals. All this fits into Obama's narcissism, nihilism and his
Messianic complex.
Obama doesn't believe in any god, since he believes he is God.
Obama doesn't believe in any god, since he believes he is God.