Tuesday, June 9, 2015

Did Hillary Buy New York Times Endorsement in 2008?

Public Secrets


That’s the implication in this Washington Free Beacon article. As Alana Goodman portrays it, the Clintons not only dish out favors in return for money, but they know how to play the game the other way, too:
"A little-known private foundation controlled by Bill and Hillary Clinton donated $100,000 to the New York Times’ charitable fund in 2008, the same year the newspaper’s editorial page endorsed Clinton in the Democratic presidential primary, according to tax documents reviewed by the Washington Free Beacon.
The Clinton Family Foundation, a separate entity from the Bill, Hillary and Chelsea Clinton Foundation, has been the family’s vehicle for personal charitable giving since 2001.
The New York Times Neediest Cases Fund is a charity affiliated with the newspaper that assists underprivileged New Yorkers. It is run by members of the New York Times Company’s board of directors and senior executives.
The Times’ editorial board endorsed Clinton against Democratic challengers John Edwards and Barack Obama on January 25, 2008, writing that she was “more qualified, right now, to be president.”
At the time, there were reports that the Times board had leaned toward endorsing Obama, but was overruled by then-chairman and publisher Arthur Sulzberger Jr., whose family controlled the paper. Sulzberger’s cousins and Times Company directors, Lynn Dolnick and Michael Golden, chaired the New York Times Neediest Cases Fund in 2008.
The Clinton Family Foundation did not list the specific date the donation was made in its public tax disclosure forms. Neither the Times nor a representative of the Clintons responded by press time to a request for comment. Clinton ended her presidential campaign on June 7, 2008.
The CFF’s $100,000 contribution to the New York Times Neediest Cases Fund is larger than its typical donations. Of the 47 organizations the CFF donated to in 2008, only six groups received more than $50,000. Most received between $2,000 and $25,000. The CFF has not donated to the Neediest Cases Fund since 2008.
The Times endorsement was controversial at the time because there was speculation about whether it was swayed by pressure from the Clintons...."
Just like all the favorable State Department decisions that came after foreign governments and business interests made big donations to the Clinton Foundation (or paid Bill for speeches), I’m sure this is all one big coincidence.

Now pull my finger.


Read More

Joe Biden Reportedly Hospitalized


Monday, June 8, 2015

Crawling Across Broken Glass

Why Democrats do not care about Hillary's Scandals


The Clintons weather scandals better than North Face weathers weather, surely in part because they have already survived so many. People have settled their opinions, expect the Clintons to behave in a certain way and their opponents to react in a certain way, and when both sides follow the script exactly nobody changes their mind. One either cares or does not care. Don't believe me? Google "Clinton scandals fatigue" and see how many stories there have been over so many years.
 There is another consideration that reinforces these tendencies for the 2016 election. The Republicans control both houses of Congress and have a critical edge on the Supreme Court heading in to 2016, and liberals are literally terrified of a GOP sweep of the federal government, which terror is only amplified by contemplating what a Republican could do with Barack Obama's approach to regulatory power. To Democrats a GOP sweep would fulfill the apocalypse, and they would crawl across broken glass, eat corporate food, or vote for Elmer Fudd to prevent it.
The Republicans could nominate Abe Lincoln and Teddy Roosevelt and the Democrats could put up Jimmy Carter and James Buchanan and virtually every liberal would still vote for the Democrats in 2016 "because SCOTUS" or some other tweetable reason. The election will be decided in maybe seven states, and in most of those by turning out the base rather than by recruiting the declining population of centrist ticket-splitters. Therefore, the value, such as it is, in talking about Hillary's scandals is to stimulate the same fear on the right as currently prevails on the left. Which, of course, changes no minds, and will lead to another president with no mandate for governing the country other than the bare fact of victory.
(http://conservativewahoo.blogspot.com/)

Water Water Everywhere......

June 6th - 4pm

June 8th - 5pm and Rising



And Now, a Word From Residents of McKinney Texas



via Tweeter

A Good Monday Morning

Sunday, June 7, 2015

Michelle Obama to be Honored in Work of Art

MIDDLE FINGER NEWS SERVICE

Milan - Michelle Obama is undoubtedly more popular then her husband these days, and on her upcoming trip to Europe she will be honored by the city of Milan and Italian Government. The First Lady, along with moms Robinson, and daughters Malaria and Sharia will visit London, Milan and Vicenza next week.

While in Milan to visit the Milan Expo 2015 as part of the First Lady's Let’s Move! initiative, a sculpture done in her honor, 'The  Grosso Culo' (see photo below) will be unveiled to the public The Sculptors believe they have captured in stone the very essence of America's First lady.

The massive work of art, commissioned for the occasion of her visit, is the creation of semi-famous sculptors  Inutile Bastardo Maiale and  Mario Cazzo Testa of the Pezzo di Merda Art Institute.

The 2700 kilo black basalt sculpture will later be moved to a more  permanent location in a parking lot near the edge of town next to the city's landfill and refuge depository. 




Stay Tuned to the Middle Finger News Network for updates on the First Lady's Travels