Maybe Barack Obama was wrong; you can put lipstick on a pig, but only if you believe you can continue to rely on the stupidity and short memories of the American Left.
Dissecting the 2008 primaries as best I can remember, it seems that Obama was originally the Ultra-Liberals attempt to get their views to the fore, because so far as they were concerned, Hillary Clinton was simply George W. Bush with a pantsuit on. No one expected Obama to win so much as to be the standard bearer of the demented Left. His 'job' was to put their issues on the table, and to warn 'centrist' dems (a contradiction in terms) that the Dingbat Wing of the party should not be taken for granted. Subsequent events, I think have proven me correct in this assumption, bearing the last two years in mind, does it look like Barack Obama was ever prepared to be President of the United States, or that he ever expected to win?
Dissecting the 2008 primaries as best I can remember, it seems that Obama was originally the Ultra-Liberals attempt to get their views to the fore, because so far as they were concerned, Hillary Clinton was simply George W. Bush with a pantsuit on. No one expected Obama to win so much as to be the standard bearer of the demented Left. His 'job' was to put their issues on the table, and to warn 'centrist' dems (a contradiction in terms) that the Dingbat Wing of the party should not be taken for granted. Subsequent events, I think have proven me correct in this assumption, bearing the last two years in mind, does it look like Barack Obama was ever prepared to be President of the United States, or that he ever expected to win?
What has resulted from a policy perspective, both foreign and domestic, seems to indicate that no, he was not expecting to win, and when he actually did, he had no plan. None of that vision stuff. What Barack Obama actually did was to let Congress do his heavy lifting while he played golf and bought time to learn what being in charge actually means, a lesson he still seem not to have mastered.
The way I see it, Clinton lost an election she had every
opportunity to win primarily for three major reasons:
(1) - She ran her campaign as if she had already won, as if the Office of President was her birthright. She seemed to be taking the Victory Lap before the race even started. She did everything but measure the Oval Office windows for new curtains (on the off-chance the old ones might still have Bill's you-know-what all over them), and plan to return the silverware that came up missing when the Bushes moved (back) in. Politically, Hillary would have been Bush-like, she would have continued the War, she would have kept the Patriot Act and she would not have advanced the same radical Health Care stupidity that Obama did (at least not in her first term). If you were a Whackjob Lefty in 2008, Hillary Clinton was George W. Bush's third term.
If you were a democratic party voter in the fall of 2008, and your choice was between The Crusty Black Pantsuit who talked a good game, but lied to your face, and could be reasonably expected to simply continue Bush's policies with only minor cosmetic changes, or the Slick Hipster 'Outsider' who had inspired you with lofty rhetoric and a thin resume, but who restored your deluded vision of the heady days of JFK, RFK and MLK, only with a Program of Reparations attached, who would you chose?
(2) - Hillary Clinton carried far too much baggage. About 200 pounds of it in the form of a guy named Bill.
(3) - In the "Great Pecking Order of Worthiest Victim Groups" that is democratic (small 'd' intentional) politics, Hillary The Heir Apparent was stunned to learn that (half-) Black Man still trumped Woman Done Wrong By Cheating and Abusive Husband. As a result, Clinton took the job of Secretary of State because it was the next best thing; it gave her a serious job (junior Senator from a state you don't really live in is like being an unpaid intern, and besides, Charles Schumer is an obnoxious asshat), and it might even prove a springboard to future success. And judging from the foreign policy mistakes of this Administration (ones that Hillary will be glad to tell you in the coming primary season were not her doing; she was simply following orders from above...yeah, like that worked at Nuremberg, too) that's not exactly something I would want on my resume.
She will pull out her old 'Centrist Democrat' disguise, something that barely exists anymore thanks to the GOP-Tea Party romp in the 2010 Mid-Terms, and run to Obama's right as a New-Old-Centrist-Blue-Dog Democrat (four lies for the price of one) while out-hawking the GOP Hawks, and do her damndest to be as indistinguishable as the most centrist Republican come 2012.
As for illegal immigration and border security, she’s been silent on both, because if you plan to run for President on the Democratic Party ticket you can't afford to offend all the illegal voters in California, your Mother Lode of illegal-alien-and-welfare-mother-supplied Electoral Votes --54 of them. That's 20% of the total required to be elected, you know. Let's see if the American electorate can still be that stupid two Presidential elections in a row, and fall for someone who's so obviously a poser, or whether the 'Throw The Bums Out' fervor of the Tea Party and the Great Middle continues.
Get your popcorn folks, there's gonna be a fight on the Left very soon. Ya heard it here first.
_______________________________
Very good analysis DS. I can hardly wait for the internecine liberal political bloodletting to begin.
ReplyDeleteThat said, I am concerned whether the old line Republican establishment will look past their de facto seniority system and realize there are a number of young Turks in the party that are more likely to energize the voters than old line retreads. And, I say that as a member of the same generation of the old line Republican leadership. It's time for Republicans to step up with some new, bold thinkers and doers. There is plenty of room for the old heads to assume advisory positions in the next Republican administration.
Good analysis. I was surprised, actually, that Hillary took the Sec. of State spot - and even more surprised at what has happened since. The Sec. of State position is usually a no win job where one takes a lot of hits. Obama's foreign policy has been poor, though there have been no blatantly obvious catastrophes - yet. That said, nearly every wrong step has been taken by some other Obama appointee. Instead of letting Clinton be the one to bumble, Obama has shut her out of many instances where the Sec. of State would normally take a leading role. Indeed, the first time I have seen her still around and talking about a burning foreign policy issue happening now was Egypt. At any rate, Obama has been, I think, too clever by half. By trying to shut Hillary out of the limelight, he has protected her from any criticism for all of his foreign missteps. Hillary is going to come out of the Sec. of State position relatively unscathed if all things continue as they have the past two years. And she will be his only real competition.
ReplyDeleteIt would be fun to see Hillary and Barack debate again after the mess he has made. Think about it. During the primaries, She would hammer him on his failures. If he got the Dem nod he would then get hammered on his failures by the republican candidate. It's a twofer!
ReplyDeleteGW,
ReplyDeleteAn excellent and complete analysis. Way to go!
Narcissists never share the glory and never accept the blame.
Will Profit,
Short, but very good. "It's a twofer!" Still LMAO on that one.