Middle Finger Symphony Theater

 ~ No Tuxedos Required ~

Brought To You By BLUESJUNKY: Middle Finger Symphony Chair of Music

Oh No! CNN's New Chief Said To Be Trying To Woo Our Squinty & Meat Puppet

CNN’s new Chief Chris Licht is rumored to allegedly be in in “secret talks” to poach MSNBC mainstays Squinty Joe Scarborough and Meat Puppet Brzezinski away from the network according to a report in Radar Online. Licht was formerly executive producer of MSNBC’s “Morning Joe” and is interested in hiring Joe and Mika as part of his overhaul of a failing CNN.

Both Scarborough and Brezezinski have contracts running through the end of the year and it’s unclear how Joe and Mika would fit into the overall strategy of the CNN's boss valiant attempt at doing hard news. (insert laugh track here)

It looks to me Licht is going for ratings rather than a hard news approach for now because Squinty and Meat Puppet, while highly rated, have forgotten what hard news is and are just MSNBC's morning kickoff of the network's day long lunatic anti-Trump rantings.

I think Licht is barking up dead wood here considering the new digs would entail all new staff. Mika would have to find a new Botox source and concrete expert to apply her makeup, and Joe a new hair stylist to mess his hair ever morning. And what about their sidekick, lil' 'Willie the Pip', who takes over the show while Mika grabs a vodka and a Marlboro, and Joe slams a door on his nuts for motivation for his daily angry rant.

I mean they have all these cool graphic done just for them and they don't have to go any where near Tater Stelter. And what about their usual guest commentators like the mumbling twins, WaPo columnist Eugene Robinson and Al Sharpton, and bulbous head Max Boot and the bitter old witch, disgraced Sen. Claire McCaskill, or those pervert Lads from the Lincoln Project? They can't take them all with them!

Unless there is enough monetary motivation to throw their long time friends overboard for a new gig, I'm not seeing it. Unless the steadily decomposing Andrea Mitchell is to much the endure, why bail from a leaky boat onto a sinking ship?   

Your Almost Semi-World Famous Irredeemable Mid-Week Open Thread

Your Beloved Blog Editrix Turns Things Over To You, The Readers. 

Please Keep Weapons In Plain Sight At All Times.

This Week Your Open Thread Sponsored By:

THE KARDASHIANS

Their Father, Robert Kardashian, was O.J. Simpson's Personal Lawyer.

The Girl's Have Devoted their Lives to Carry On Their Father's 

Legacy Of Getting Black Men Off.

The Krazy Old Bat Warned Us. We Laughed.

Not long past, some Krazy Old Bat pronounced "It Takes a Village to Raise a Child". We laughed because we understood not what it portended. People who now call themselves Progressive did. But first, let's clear the air about the word "Progressive". We are talking a sort of slight of hand here. Progressive philosophy is rooted in 19th century Marx and his extreme anti-democratic socialist philosophy, and radical social reformer and education philosopher, John Dewey, who believed education is the fundamental method of radical social progress and reform.

They are rooted early 20th century racist and eugenicists ideas of Margret Sanger, and the mid century sex researcher & homosexual pedophile, Alfred Kinsey. Let's be clear, what progressives put forth is not progress as presented today. They are mostly regurgitated stale idealistic machinations left to survive in the minds of idealist academics. Pure and simple, It's Regression. And we should start calling the advocates what they really are, Regressives.

Not a day goes by we don't hear some kind of policy coming from regressives that are rooted in just these four examples. There are many more unnamed people and principals besides these few. We laughed at that Krazy Old Bat and her pronouncement. Perhaps we should have taken it as a warning.

This brings us to story at Breitbart yesterday. California School Board Eyes Opening Planned Parenthood on High School Campus in in 80% Latino, 90 percent minority school district.

A 90 percent minority District?

The Selected Papers of  Margaret Sanger, Volume 2, contains a speech to supporters (edited out in post 1980 editions) that the "weeds" (non white races) in the human race should be kept under control or eliminated. Planned Parenthood has followed her direction ever since its founding and has succeeded far beyond her wildest dreams. This does fit with the Democrat' racist view of minorities. They are their necessary 'useful idiots'.

From Breitbart: 

"Taxpayers should be horrified that the Norwalk-La Mirada USD is considering a partnership with Planned Parenthood, Parents Defending Education president and founder Nicole Neily told Fox News. The fact that the contract specifically notes that ‘under California law minors have the right to consent to reproductive health services without parental consent or notification’ is appalling in and of itself. 

Referring to the possibility of students being referred to off-campus clinics for “services not offered,” Neily continued, “Other Planned Parenthood clinics do provide gender-affirming hormone therapy, so there is a very real possibility students will be referred off-campus to receive this treatment – again, with zero parental notification. 

To add insult to injury, there is no way for parents to EVER obtain this information, as the contract asserts that all medical records are to be maintained by Planned Parenthood...."

Again, perhaps we should have taken the Krazy Old Bat's words as a warning. Since the pandemic, "The Village" and it methods used to sway young minds have come to light for all to see, a cancer on the countries minds and bodies.

Just a brief glance at social media makes it clear it's not just a Village we're dealing with. But a Village of the Damned.

~ Thank You MJA@IOTWReport for the Linkage! ~

A Good Monday Morning

Another Episode of “You Can’t Make This Sh*t up Because Left-Wing Loons Already Did”. #259

RS - Given the left’s hellbent drive to label virtually everything in — and about —America as “racist,” this nutjob story should come as no surprise to anyone. My fellow Americans: some of the names we give our dogs are racist. Who knew?

According to a Social Psychology Quarterly study, a disparity in adoption times for dogs exists based on “racial associations” with the names we give America’s favorite pets. Bottom line? Dogs with “white-sounding” names are more quickly adopted than dogs with black- or Hispanic-sounding names.

Social Psychology Quarterly asks, “almost” as if the leftist “study” was conducted with a conclusion already in mind, simply so the study could then be presented as further “proof” that that in “racist” America, nothing is untouchable — including the names we give our furry friends.

I want to be fair, here. But this ridiculous “study” is insane in its depth, breadth, graphs, charts, mathematical equations, myriad of footnotes, and whatever else the authors apparently assumed they needed to “prove” their race-obsessed assumptions about “racially-associated” dog names — a conclusion I have no doubt was reached before the study was conducted.

As noted by Campus Reform, correlations were largely concentrated around pit bulls, “a breed that is stereotyped as dangerous and racialized as Black,” according to the study. Incidentally, pit bulls aren’t my thing, based primarily on their sometimes affinity for ripping to shreds random innocents or even their owners, but they do seem to get their share of negative press, but I digress.

Hypothesis 1: Dogs with White-sounding names will have shorter times to adoption, compared to dogs with names that are not perceived as White. Dogs with Black- and Hispanic-sounding names will have longer times to adoption, compared to dogs with names that are not perceived as Black or Hispanic. 

Hypothesis 2: The effects of racialized names will be stronger among pit bulls than among other breeds. Pit bulls with White-sounding names will have shorter times to adoption, compared to pit bulls with names that are not perceived as White. Pit bulls with Black- and Hispanic-sounding names will have longer times to adoption, compared to pit bulls with names that are not perceived as Black or Hispanic. 

Hypothesis 3: Nonhuman names will be associated with shorter times to adoption, compared to dogs with names that are perceived as human.

And off to the analytical-to-the-max races, the study’s authors went. 

Just one problem. Try as I might, and I might have missed a table or two along the way after my eyes glazed over, but I didn’t see a single example of a “white-sounding” or “racially-associated” dog name example. Perhaps these “brilliant” academicians are suggesting it’s similar to the old definition of porn: hard to define, but you know it when you see it.

Dr. Nefertiti A. Walker, Ph.D., Professor and Vice-Chancellor at the University of UMass Amherst, who muses about such “critical” issues as culture, exclusion, inclusion, and equity, was eagerly all in:

"Fascinating research that supports the resiliency of racialized names and the pervasiveness of anti-Blackness. Must read work."

Regardless, this ridiculous, scientific-y “study” within the no-longer hallowed halls of academia is just one more effort to racialize every aspect of America that race-obsessed useful idiots eagerly vomit on America.

Middle Finger Symphony Theater

 ~ No Tuxedos Required ~

Brought To You By BLUESJUNKY: Middle Finger Symphony Music Chair of Music