And What if Trump Wins the Nomination?

Will The Republican Establishment Elect Hillary

by Ben Shapiro  

With both Donald Trump and Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX) running ahead of establishment favorite Senator Marco Rubio (R-FL) in Rubio’s home state of Florida, the establishment is beginning to realize how precarious its situation actually is. Cruz and Trump are most likely to win Iowa; Rubio is running a distant third in current polling. In New Hampshire, Rubio runs a distant second behind Trump, but he’s grouped in with Governor Chris Christie (R-NJ), Cruz, Governor John Kasich (R-OH) and former Governor Jeb Bush (R-FL).

And so the possibility now arises: if Donald Trump is the nominee, will the Republican Party back him? Or will they destroy the party the way they suggested ardent conservatives were poised to do in 2008 and 2012?

It appears that Republican establishment figures are already thinking along those lines. On Thursday, former New Jersey governor Christine Todd Whitman wrote:

“Republicans, now is the time to defeat this scourge of our party. We can make America great again by defeating the selfishness, arrogance and bigotry of Donald Trump.” 

She called Trump “evil” and compared him to Hitler. She called Trump a threat to “the very foundational values on which our party and our nation were built.”

Does that sound like someone prepared to support Trump if he wins the nomination?

On Wednesday, Politico reported that Bush aides “began looking into the possibility of making a clear break with Trump – potentially with the candidate stating that, if Trump were the nominee, Bush would not support him….the option may still be on the table.”

Meanwhile, Joe Scarborough said on MSNBC’s Morning Joe that if Trump were the nominee, the Republican Party honchos would run a third party candidate to split the vote and give Hillary Clinton the presidency:

“I think Haley Barbour and a lot of the Republican leaders would much rather Hillary Clinton be President of the United States than have Donald Trump represent them as a Republican.” Scarborough went on to suggest that the establishment would recruit Mitt Romney or Michael Bloomberg to run third party to take a “political bullet for his party.”

Back at the end of November, The Hill suggested that GOP donors would back Hillary over Trump: 

“In conversations over the past month, GOP establishment donors have confided to The Hill that for the first time in recent memory, they find themselves contemplating not supporting a Republican nominee for president.”

The establishment and their donor base have spent so much time trying to determine how to lock grassroots conservatives out of the halls of power that they’re now finding themselves overrun – and they’re fleeing into the arms of defeat. Trump’s ascendancy has made one thing crystal clear: the establishment wouldn’t just prefer Hillary over Trump – their decision not to support Trump virtually guarantees Hillary the presidency – but that they would prefer Hillary over Ted Cruz. They could, at any time, move their support from Rubio and Christie and Kasich and Bush to Cruz; if they did so, Cruz would wallop Trump in the primaries. They aren’t doing so, because they hold out hope that Rubio will somehow pull victory from the jaws of defeat.

That hope is fading. The longer they wait, the clearer it becomes that the establishment’s worst nightmare isn’t merely Trump, but something bigger: losing control of the Party to either a hard-line conservative or a populist. It’s their way or the highway.

And if they don’t get their way, they’ll make Hillary Clinton president.

(via The Daily Wire) 

Obese Land Whale Protests in Front of Trump Tower

Michael Moore stood outside New York’s famous Trump Tower yesterday in protest of its namesake’s recent controversial comments regarding Muslims. His message to Donald Trump? “We are all Muslim.”

You can read more about it HERE 

WHCA Picks Leftist Douche to Host Next White House Correspondents’ Dinner

Comedy Centrals' Pointy Headed Comedian(?)Larry Wilmore

NewsBusters

A conservative-hating, liberal comic has been chosen for the 2016 White House Correspondents Dinner. This time, it’s Nightly Show anchor Larry Wilmore. Scheduled for April 30, the dinner will likely contain many of the slimy attacks the comedian is known for. On November 30, Wilmore blaming the Planned Parenthood shooting on Fox News. 

Regarding claims that the shooter shouted “no more baby parts,” the host sneered that it’s “almost as if it was served up in a nice cold pitcher of Fox and their friends’ Kool-Aid.” In September, Wilmore mocked Kentucky clerk Kim Davis as similar to George Wallace and serial killer Jeffrey Dahmer.   

In December, the comic declared “creepy” Ted Cruz to possibly be mentally ill. While his guest, Aida Rodriguez, claimed that the Texas senator’s agenda will be “to do everything the KKK does.”  Politico quoted the White House Correspondent Association President’s praise for Wilmore:  

“Larry’s edgy, even provocative, brand of humor means he’s certainly up to the task of skewering politicians of all ideological stripes, and we don’t expect the nation’s news media to escape unscathed, either,“ said WHCA President Carol Lee, a White House correspondent for The Wall Street Journal. “We are thrilled that Larry has accepted our invitation to be the featured comedian at our annual dinner, which will be the last during the Obama White House.”

______________________________

Well I guess it's no real surprise a group of people pretending to be journalist who can't recognize the truth right in front of them would actually know the difference between a real comedian and a propagandist pretending to be funny....

If you have spent 150 million dollars on your campaign and have 3% in the polls to show for it, you might be Jeb Bush.

I suspect the guy in front is just waiting to take the chairs back to the rent-all.

Bring A Muslim to Work Day

Rep. Noodle Head Schulz and Muzzie Rep. Keith Ellison

Democrat National Committee Chairperson and all-around lunatic Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-Fla) is asking her fellow congress peoples to do an 'In Your Face' to immigration opponents by bringing a Muslim to the upcoming State of the Union address, like they are some kind of liberal fashion accessory. 

Politico

Two senior Democratic lawmakers are asking their colleagues to bring a Muslim-American guest to the State of the Union in protest of Donald Trump's recent proposal to ban Muslims from entering the U.S.

In a letter sent to House Democrats and Republicans on Tuesday, Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz, the chairwoman of the Democratic National Committee, and Rep. Keith Ellison, the first Muslim elected to Congress, said lawmakers should bring Muslim-Americans to the Jan. 12 speech as a way to rebut anti-Muslim rhetoric.

"Over the past few weeks we have seen a shocking and alarming rise in hateful rhetoric against one particular minority population in our nation." 

 "Leading political figures have made offensive and outrageous suggestions that we should create a national registry of all people of one particular faith and that we should prevent any person of that faith from even entering this great country...."

Ellison and Wasserman Schultz said that bringing a Muslim-American guest would show “our compatriots and the world that we will not be intimidated by fear into discrimination. There could be no stronger expression of support for our American values than sending this message of solidarity through the extension of this invitation.”

There was no word on suggested wardrobe for the occasion as to whether their guest should wear an evening Burka or business casual Hijab. 

Yes, We All Paid for Magnolia Thunderpussy’s Sex Change Operation

.....and we never even got a Thank You Card. 

" Jerome " "Magnolia Thunderpussy"  "Meeka,"  "Kricket" 

via Moonbattery

Work faster! It is your duty as a taxpayer to at least try to generate wealth as quickly as the government wastes it on sick lunacy like this: 

A former she-male hooker, only a year out of jail on a fraud conviction, just received a full “sex change” operation, courtesy of the American taxpayer. His story is loving told over more than four full pages in Sunday’s edition of the New York Times. Jerome Nimmons tells his story of growing up effeminate, HIV infection and a life turned to prostitution and other forms of crime.

Plus he’s a person of politically preferred pigmentation, making him a model citizen and hero from the liberal intelligentsia’s viewpoint.

Jerome’s story, however, eventually becomes yet a newer iteration of what Ronald Reagan called the “welfare queen.” Though Jerome was living with other transvestites in Atlanta, was lured to Brooklyn by a friend because New York has become something of a welfare haven for transsexuals. Arriving by bus with only $200 in his pocket, within only a few weeks, Jerome scored a state-supported apartment, monthly disability checks, obtained food stamps, and proceeded to spend his leisurely days watching television. 

He found a pro bono lawyer to help him get a new transsexual name. The New York Times reports this is a new and booming pro bono area in the law. Though Jerome had used various names in his transsexual life, including “Magnolia Thunderpussy” and “Meeka,” the name he settled on was “Kricket,” inspired in part by one of his favorite characters on The Young and the Restless.  

The new surroundings, vast government support, a new name, and—most importantly—a change in insurance put Jerome on track to go all the way with his change of “sex." Jerome says he is now no longer a “chick with a wiener” but “a woman in mind, body, and soul, before the Lord and before the law.”    

Jerome now considers himself a “heterosexual woman” and is now dating a “transgender man,” that is, a woman who thinks she’s a man..... 

Jerome has the skill that is most useful at this stage in society’s decline. He knows how to get other people to pay for everything.

Obama Has Some 'Select' Friends Over For a Party

Seems BLM Fake Negro Shaun King Got a Lil' Case of Butt Hurt

That He Didn't Get Invited to the White House.  

BlackLivesMatter's Deray Mckesson (left) and Johnetta Elzie (center)

The glaring lack of class of the Obama Presidency and friends is almost unbearable. No one could have imagined the level of disgrace he's brought to the office if they had tried. Thugs, race baiters, criminals and terrorist sympathizers. His associations run the gamut. The Founding Fathers would weep for their country and what they left to us.