Fishnet Friday

Special Ed Schultz Heads Back to the Short Bus

The website Mediaite is reporting MSNBC, NBC News retarded step-sister, is axing everyone's favorite angry white guy, the screaming crazy uncle, Ed Schultz. "Special Ed", known for comments like Jews were not the real target of the Holocaust, it was about the gays, often pulled better ratings then the pointless effeminate droning of  "Chris Hayes and All In" at 8 PM.  But Hayes is a favorite of MSNBC boss Phil Griffin (yeah, we know what's gonna on there, don't we), while the network head has been trying to get rid of crazy Ed for years.

MSNBC had decided months ago that they would be dumping their liberal hosts in favor of people like NBC's milk toast Chuck Todd and a rehabilitated Brian Williams in order to regain some respectability. *cough*  It's said by some that the MSNBC leadership completely mistreated their poor uninformed liberal audience, and when the audience walked away in mass, the network used the declining ratings as an excuse to blame liberals. (I suspect it was their unemployment ran out and they lost the cable service).

The only hosts that seem to not be in the target at the network are some guy named Joe Scarborough and the gender confused little Ricky Maddow.  Al Sharpton, the network's in-house political philosopher and linguistics expert at "Politics Nation with Al Sharpton" has apparently seen the shining glean of the axe blade and announced his own media watchdogg blog called “The Shift Daily”, which he may come to regret the choice of name. (Stay tuned for some hilarity coming from that site). 

Hit hardest by the move to remove Special Ed was Presidential Candidate Sen. Bernie Sanders, who blasted MSNBC in a statement for canceling Schultz and removing one of the few voices who would give the nutty fucker a place to vent his socialist nonsense on television:

"I am very disappointed that Comcast chose to remove Ed Schultz from its lineup. We need more people who talk about the real issues facing our country, not fewer.

At a time when a handful of large, multi-national corporations own our major media outlets, I hope they will allow voices to be heard from those who dissent from the corporate media agenda bla bla bla...."

I alway thought Ed missed his calling as a used car salesman.  

And the crazy train whistle echoes in the distance..... 

Meanwhile, The Dems Have Their Crazys to Deal With

Democrats Want Bernie Sanders Out Of The Race!

Down Trend

The Democrats are terrified of Bernie Sanders. They love him, they agree with him and they think he would make a great president. But they’re petrified that he will be their nominee because they know very few people with more than three brain cells will vote for a self proclaimed socialist as President of the United States. 

The latest example of this terrified frenzy is Barney Frank’s 1,000-word rant against Bernie. He implores Democrats not to support Bernie. Even though they love him, adore him … almost worship him.

[Bernie] has consistently, forcefully and cogently made the case for a larger federal government role in improving both the fairness and the quality of life in our country, refusing to soft-pedal in the face of declining support for this view in public opinion.

Sounds great! How about Bernie’s stand against the War in Iraq and Hillary’s support of it?

I agree that her position on the war is a legitimate concern for those of us on the left. The question then becomes whether this was a manifestation of a general tendency to support unwise military intervention, or the case of her joining every other Democratic senator who had serious presidential ambitions in voting for a war that the Bush-Cheney administration had successfully hyped as a necessary defense against terrorism. While I wish that she, Joe Biden and John Kerry had not been spooked into believing that no one who voted no would have the national security merit badge required to win the presidency, I regard liberal senators’ support for the Iraq War as a response to a given fraught political situation rather than an indication of their basic policy stance — like Obama’s off-again, on-again support for same-sex marriage. (Yes, I am saying that in deciding whether or not to support a candidate with whom I have disagreed on a fundamental issue, I am more at ease if it was a one-time political accommodation rather than a genuine conviction.)

So if they love Bernie so bad, why can’t they support him? - READ MORE

Former Congressman Barney Frank Enjoying a Summer Afternoon in Boston

Like His Hair, Trump Blows With The Political Wind

And what was that famous phrase from P.T.Barnum......

Laredo Tx. Residents Excited at Word of Trump Visit

Members of the Laredo Pharmaceutical Distributors Association
and Barrio Protectionist Society Welcoming Committee  

The Donald fuels up the 757 and grabs a tank of industrial strength hair spray and heads for the Texas border Thursday...... 

“I’ve been invited by the Border Patrol, and they want to honor me, actually, thousands and thousands of them, because I’m speaking up. These are tremendous people; these are tough people. They want to do the job, and they’re not allowed to do their job by the president, essentially."

“I may never see you again, but we’re going to do it"

Obama's War of Retribution on America

Maybe It's Time to Start Issuing Arrest Warrants 

Why does Congress allow Government Officials to ignore federal law and the Constitution they vow to uphold?

Article 1, Section 8 of the Constitution gives Congress exclusive authority to establish a uniform Rule of Naturalization. The Supreme Court, in Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Chadha, clearly stated that the plenary authority of Congress over aliens under Art. I, is not open to question. This determination was reiterated in Arizona v. United States,when the Court held that Congress could trump state laws dealing with illegal aliens through the preemption doctrine but competing executive branch enforcement priorities could not.

The President's constitutional duty to enforce the laws derives from Art. II, sec. 3, which states that the President shall take Care that the laws be faithfully executed. This is imperative language: It instructs that the President shall take Care; not take Care if he feels like it. His duty is to execute the laws not some of the laws, not just the ones the President likes, but all of the laws. And he has to execute those laws.

Sarah Saldaña, Director of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE)

Leon Rodriquez, Director of Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS)

Which brings us to the two people pictured above, both involved in the lawless  sanctuary jurisdiction actions and lack of enforcement of law.  

Ever wonder why such sensitive domestic policy cabinet post such as Department of Justice (Attorney General Loretta E. Lynch), Department of Labor (Secretary Thomas E. Perez), Department of Housing and Urban Development, (Secretary Julián Castro), Department of Homeland Security (Secretary Jeh Johnson), (Anthony Foxx ) Secretary of Transportation and the many directors and commissioners of  departments  like Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and  Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) are filled with minorities with special interest group connections? Not to mention Supreme Court Justices with radical Hispanic sympathies, and LGBT activist past?

While the average American sleep walks through life, watching Dancing with the Stars or their favorite felon play ball on Sunday afternoon, Barack Obama has given over authority of much of domestic policy to his many minority appointees who share his views, many who refuse to let go of perceived past wrongs and now are now wheeling authoritarian powers where it counts. Anybody remember that guy, what's his name..... Eric Holder?

Giving just enough shady wiggle room for politicians to to twist out with voters back home, the lapdog media their talking points to cover for him, a lawless President proceeds to write his own laws and ignore the constitution at will while tearing down the nation to rebuilding it in his image.

The latest example:
My own Sen. David Vitter (R-LA) repeatedly pressed  Sarah Saldaña, Director of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) on why the Administration was taking no action against sanctuary jurisdictions that refuse to turn over dangerous criminal aliens from their prisons and jails to federal law officers while thumbing their nose at federal law:

Vitter: “This has been going on for years and you still are not prepared to say that there is ever going to be any negative consequence to those [sanctuary] jurisdictions. When is that going to change?”

Saldaña: “I presume when you all address comprehensive immigration reform; perhaps it can be addressed there.”

Senator Vitter, once again: " Congress could trump state laws dealing with illegal aliens through the preemption doctrine but competing executive branch enforcement priorities could not.

Immigration Legislation has been written behind closed doors with handpicked special interest groups which put their political agendas and financial gains before sound and effective law and the welfare and safety of the American public. As illegals comment crimes all across the nation, a 1,200 page bill before the Senate will provide instant legalization and a path to citizenship to gang members and other dangerous criminal aliens, and handcuff ICE officers from enforcing immigration laws in the future. 

Instead of debating about an unconstitutional act and demands by a lawless President who has opened up America and it's treasury to the third world and potential enemies who have declare to take us down, congress should exercise their power and demand enforcement of laws already in place and confirmed by the Supreme Court, or start issuing arrest warrants for Barack's appointed enemies of the state. 

They're Shocked! Just Shocked.....

Ma Clinton has been handing out beer koozies to Des Moines residents and inviting Cedar Rapids soccer moms to private dinners where she can pick their brains, her numbers have been tanking across the board - not in early states, but in the swing states she needs to top Republicans in the eventual 2016 contest. According to a new poll from Quinnipiac, Clinton is being creamed by the three top Republican candidates everywhere it counts.