A Good Monday Morning

Middle Finger Symphony Sunday Matinee (Kinda Sorta...)

* No Tuxedos Required *

Middle Finger Symphony Theater

* No Tuxedos Required *

Brought To You By BLUESJUNKY: Honorary Chair Of Music - Middle Finger Symphony Music Director

Moonbats and Problematic & Offensive Disney Films

I have to admit, when I first heard gay Hollywood had gained control of Disney Studios I expected the worst. But the infectious stew of Political Correct Theology and Self-Righteous Hypocrisy that has since swept Hollywood actors burns even hotter than any of us predicted. 

Recent case-in-point are two actresses who have publicly for some reason announced they no longer allow their children to be negatively influenced by some classic Disney animated films made from fairy tales beloved by past generations, because Snow White is kissed non-consensually by a necrophilic prince, and "Cinderella" and "The Little Mermaid" reinforce the sexist "damsel in distress" theme.  As I have said here numerous times, I didn't give a shit about their opinions when these over-payed Hollywood imbeciles were waiting on my table, and I still don't. I rarely see their work. But, it's bad enough we already have Whoopie Goldberg giving us a  politically correct warning at the beginning of the video box sets of classic Warner Bros. Loonie Tunes Cartoons, that I can't help but wonder how long before the same is mandated for a Hans Christian Anderson or Brothers Grimm Fairy tales.

Matt Walsh takes all this to an obvious conclusion with a tongue-and-cheek attack on Disney's disgracefully animated sexism and bigotry that Hollywood feminist believe threatens the minds of children. There has to be a statue of Walt somewhere that needs to be torn down........

________________________________________

Problematic And Offensive Disney Films That No Child 
Should Ever Be Allowed To Watch
 

By Matt Walsh

Pocahontas - I cannot for the life of me understand why "Pocahontas" hasn't been banned and all of the people involved in its production sent to prison camps. "Pocahontas" features extremely harmful and retrograde Native American stereotypes and a deeply troubling White Savior story line. The character Pocahontas is not only sexualized and objectified but reduced to an outdated caricature of an Indian woman who sings about the wind and talks to trees.
Aladdin - Where to begin? Shall we discuss the Middle Eastern stereotypes, the eroticized female character, or the titular Arabic boy who looks and sounds suspiciously white? "It was Euro-colonialist propaganda that utterly trivialized and finally erased the lived experience of actual Arabs. And of course this is all to say nothing of the Genie, a person of color who is caged in a lamp and forced to serve Aladdin as a literal slave. Euro-colonialist, indeed.
Pinocchio - Pinocchio" is a transphobic river of bigoted filth gushing down a mountain of sexism and racism. Pinocchio spends the whole film pining to become "a real boy." A more progressive and enlightened movie would send Pinocchio out on a quest to become a poly-amorous lesbian or an androgynous genderqueer asexual. Instead, Pinocchio is assigned his gender by his deranged puppet master and he never once questions it or even considers whether the very idea of "real boyhood" might in fact be a primitive philosophical artifact of a backward and binary age.
The Lion King -  Set in Africa yet almost all of the characters are voiced by white actors. One of the only black characters in the whole film is Mufasa, and guess what happens to him? He's trampled to death by wildebeests in one of the most racist moments in Hollywood history. Notice that the wildebeests are also black, which is a not-so-subtle reference to the bigoted "black on black crime" motif.

I could continue this list but it is causing me to relive the trauma I experienced when I first saw these movies. Certainly, "Winnie the Pooh" is out because of its harmful portrayal of overweight people and its pseudoscientific insistence that obesity is linked to sugar consumption. "Toy Story" is problematic because the boy only owns gender-typical toys. "Lady and the Tramp" makes light of sexual assault when the boy dog non-consensually kisses the girl dog as they share a plate of spaghetti. "Bambi" sends a troubling message about animal rights. "The Sword in the Stone" is 90 minutes of toxic masculinity. "Tarzan" features a man who thinks he's a monkey, which is clearly meant to mock and trivialize body dysmorphia.

Perhaps the only acceptable and even halfway progressive Disney movie is "The Hunchback of Notre Dame." The straight white male is a hideous, deformed virgin beast rightly exiled from polite society. This, indeed, is how all white men ought to be portrayed. If only they could all be locked in a bell tower and forgotten. Then perhaps the rest of us could finally live in peace.

Thank You MJA@IOTWReport for the Linkage!

Think Things Have Been Contentious Lately, Wait Till Nov. 7th.

In normal times the next presidential campaign would begin the day after the midterm elections. Now, in the age of anti-Trump media / Twitter Era, and all remnants of political normalcy extinguished, the 2020 Democratic primary campaign has already been raging for months. And anyone who has followed politics will agree that the assets, energy, and passion displayed during the lead up to this midterm cycle is more on par with the 2016 presidential election. What will be unique about the 2020 election is it will be the first in which the full forces of the “uncivil war” are unleashed, and even encouraged by some elected leaders and flame-throwing media pretending to be journalist. An increase in extreme passion will lead to frequent mass protests orchestrated by professional organizers representing left-wing groups. “Angry mobs” are now part of the chaotic political/cultural landscape. Quickly assembled via social media, and fueled by the prospects of DJT's re-election, that political passion will likely incite more confrontations in the streets and public places. The democrat base are certifiably a leftist cult. Win or lose on Nov. 6, expect them to come unglued. 

Two decades ago in what was quaintly called “the culture wars”, the fight to keep a national culture steeped in the traditional Judeo/Christian values upon which it was founded was lost, and defeat quickly morphed into a full scale vengeful “uncivil war.” This term is now widely used to describe the unhinged polarization and win-at-all-costs partisanship of the left.  Divisive racial, gender, anti-government and single-issue-based identity groups are now permanent forces. Many are well-funded, growing more militant and on track to become even more powerful and disruptive in 2020. Identity groups are empowered by the results of bloc voting. Ultimately, this means that instead of E pluribus unum, Latin for “Out of many, one”, the motto should now read, “E pluribus schisma” – “Out of many, division.” 

If Democrats win control of the House of Representatives, Donald Trump could be the first president to run for re-election while impeachment proceedings are underway. The 2020 presidential election will steer our nation through a gasoline-soaked incendiary course, even without impeachment. And so, if impeachment is thrown into the proverbial political fire, prepare for an historic inferno and much gnashing of teeth.

Thank You WHATFINGER NEWS for the Linkage!

Democrats Fear Third Rate Ambulance Chaser Will Drag The Party Into the Gutter

Many Democrats believe the Third Rate Ambulance Chaser with a Napoleon Complex and legal council to porn queen/stripper Stormy what's her name, Micheal Avenatti, damaged their grand plan to stop Brett Kavanaugh from being confirmed to the Supreme Court. As one senior Democratic aide told The Hill at the time, "Avenatti “f*cked it all up” when he introduced a third women making outrageous claims against Kavanaugh.

And now, democrats are afraid the creepy porn lawyer will drag the party into a gutter fight they can't win......or as they should have said, further into the gutter than they already are.....

BPR - Creepy porn lawyer Michael Avenatti was hit Monday with a second major fail in recent weeks when a California federal court dismissed porn star Stormy Daniels’ defamation lawsuit against President Donald Trump, ordering her to pay Trump’s legal fees — a humiliating defeat for Avenatti. 

But this hasn’t deterred Avenatti from trying to establish himself as a leading voice in the Democrat Party — whether the party wants his “smash mouth” approach or not. Having toyed with the idea of running for president in 2020, Avenatti told The Hill on Monday that prominent Democrat strategists are “out of touch” and “clueless” about how to win against Trump and Republicans.

“I think they’re out of touch. I don’t think they understand what’s required. I think they’re clueless. We’re not living in 2012 or 2008 or 1992 anymore. You’ve got to engage in smash-mouth politics if you’re going to beat Donald Trump. Democrats are not going to beat Donald Trump by engaging in wishy washy yammering ways of the past. It’s never going to happen. The only way you’re going beat him is by hitting him twice as hard as he hits you. He is a classic bully and that’s how you deal with bullies.”

That's a strategy he may want to discuss with a few Republicans who tried it during the 2016 GOP primary. 

“There’s a difference between getting in the gutter and being tough, and I don’t think Michael Avenatti understands that,” Patti Solis Doyle, Hillary Clinton’s campaign manager in 2008 told The Hill. “This isn’t a strategy, this is a spectacle,” Doyle added. “And the spectacle is great for getting a lot of Twitter followers and retweets, but when push comes to shove … what’s he doing for the party?” 

According to The Hill, Avenatti has been “informally seeking advice from Adam Parkhomenko,” co-founder and executive director of the super PAC Ready for Hillary. Given his record of failure, it’s only fitting that Avenatti seeks advice from those who were defeated by Trump. - Read More

Face It Lizzy, You're Just Another White Girl.......

We all laughed at Rachel Dolezal, a woman so obsessed with racial politics that she found her skin to be so offensive to her that she literally did what was necessary to pass herself off as a black woman. Even the left, who was ironically shouting that boys could be girls and vice versa thought her a loon. They need racial issues to be a set thing in order to keep up a thriving privilege narrative and racial divide for healthy voting blocs.

Elizabeth Warren has been struggling against her whiteness for some time. As a Senator, there isn’t really anything special about her. She’s a wealthy, upper-class white woman who has no stand-out characteristics in her personality, except she can be obnoxiously verbose. As far as she goes, she’s another brick in the Democrat sewer drain. What Warren does have is a need for attention, an edge.

She chose to claim Native American ancestry and has benefited from her deception. She was laughed at by the right as tribes denounced her claim due to not finding her lineage in any of their carefully kept records. Regardless, she continued to double, triple, and quadruple down on the claim. She had to because if she didn’t she would just be white. According to the media, Senator Lizzy has now proven that she has Native American ancestry, but mostly has proven she has about as much Native American ancestry as everyone else. And the natives ain't happy.

To make matters worse, she wasn’t even actually tested against Native American DNA (much less Cherokee, which was her original claim). Instead, she was tested against DNA from…Mexico, Peru, and Colombia.

Yes, you read that right. The reason for this is obvious. She clearly didn’t have any Cherokee DNA as she claimed, so the tester decided he’d use just Latin American DNA as a stand in so he could prop up her claim. He found a tiny bit of Latin American DNA within her heritage and used that to say that she has Native American heritage. How does he make this claim? Because some Native Americans, going back to crossing from Russia tens of thousands of years ago, kept going and ended up south of the modern United States. 

But the wagons were circled  and the talking points in her defense went out to the media.

In 2020, any mention of this will elicit claims that she was telling the truth, that the media reported on it, and that it’s a closed case. They are already trying to frame this in the same vein as the birther non-sense. It’s all nakedly transparent.

(Bonchies Diaries)
H/T Konan The Bar Barron

Thank You WHATFINGER NEWS for the Linkage