Showing posts with label Scummy Democrats. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Scummy Democrats. Show all posts

Tuesday, July 26, 2022

Democrats Can’t Run From Their Extremist Votes


Democrats are now desperate to separate themselves from the Doddering Old Man in the WH and his far-left agenda they once so smugly embraced ahead of the midterm elections this fall. In particular, Chuck Schumer's little cult of incumbent Senate Democrats. Given the heft of the far-left agenda and wealth of extremist votes pushed by Schumer since Jan 2021, that idea seems to be little more than wishful thinking.

Passing Tax Hikes and Massive Spending, ironically called Biden's "American Rescue Plan" and the $1.2 trillion + "infrastructure" bill, which contained little in the way of hard infrastructure. We were warned that this spending would set off inflationary pressures of a kind not seen in a generation. Since these bills were passed, inflation has outpaced wage growth every single month. Every single Democrat Senator that voted in favor of the American Rescue Plan also voted for the infrastructure bill, meaning that every single one is responsible for the inflation those bills caused.

After winning the slimmest possible majority in 2020, Democrats embarked on a campaign to either rig or destroy the institutions of American democracy, including the sacredness of the secret ballot, the Electoral College, the Supreme Court, the U.S. Senate, and Citizenship itself. They called their nasty little scheme the "For the People Act", an underhanded attempt to federalize elections and outlaw popular election integrity measures like Voter ID and bans on ballot harvesting, as well as expand government censorship of political speech, instituted public funding of political campaigns and just generally eliminate state’s rights to conduct their own elections.

Schumer has made clear that, if they can pick up even one seat in the Senate this fall, he will move again to abolish the centuries-old filibuster rule that protects minority rights in the Senate chamber, but also move quickly on other efforts effectuating a Washington takeover of elections, pack the Supreme Court, pack the Senate by adding new blue states, and eliminate the Electoral College, thus allowing a few heavily-populated blue cities and states to decide presidential elections.

While gaslighting American taxpayers about the border being secure, Democrats have exacerbated the border crisis by voting in favor of policies that encourage more illegal immigration. Monthly border apprehensions have already shattering records and the border is being overrun. While taxpayers struggle, Senate Democrats voted against a bill last year that would have prevented billions in taxpayer money from going to illegal aliens as part of the American Rescue Plan. Senate Democrats also shot down a bill to “prohibit illegal aliens with criminal records from receiving conditional or lawful permanent resident status in the United States.”

These votes send a dangerous message to the world that illegal alien criminals will be rewarded, not punished, for breaking U.S. laws. Heading into the midterm elections, Biden did no one any favors when he said “48 out of 50 Senators vote with me 95% of the time.” While Democrats may now try to escape culpability for the many problems Americans face, their voting record is something they can’t hide from and should have their nose rubbed in it like puppy shit. 

And yes, our way of life and system of government is in danger. Explaining these disastrous votes may well be one of the best ways to make the case to America why we are at this point and why it’s time to flush some turds out of Washington.

Wednesday, October 14, 2020

The Barrett Death Star is Fully Operational.

Crazy Mazie Hirono
Crazy Mazie Hirono

Does Amy Coney Barrett hate medicine? I'm not asking whether she dislikes swallowing pills and anything that smacks of what children refer to as "yucky medicine taste." I am thinking of something more visceral: seething rage at the thought that somewhere a child might be having his appendix removed instead of dying after it ruptures, or impassioned ranting against the iniquity of a widowed grandmother getting insulin for her diabetes.

I am asking because this kind of cartoon villainy is roughly the impression being projected as Judge Amy's character that one might get after listening to hours of loose babble from self righteous showboating Democrats during the early Senate hearings on her nomination to the Supreme Court.

In Barrett's America, according to the psycho Hawaiian pineapple, Senator Mazie Hirono, who would have you believe bands of warlords will roam the streets shaking down St. Jude Mathathons and burning the results of screenings for testicular cancer. The funny thing about the absurd sounding hypotheticals raised by Hirono about the consequences of Barrett's nomination for her own health is that at no point did she acknowledge that she has spent most of her adult life eligible for the top tier, gold plated state & federal government health-care plans you and I payed for.

Apart from these absurd insinuations about judge Amy coming for your physical therapy pillow, the hearing was memorable largely for its technological mishaps. I have never felt more comfortable with the 17th amendment's insistence that the men and women of the Senate are the people's chosen representatives than I did seeing them struggle with Zoom like the rest of us.

Headlines like "Supreme Court nominee Amy Coney Barrett has seven kids. And don't you dare forget it," which is unusually nasty even by the standards of Jeff Bezos' newspaper, tell the story of Monday far more succinctly than I could. Because I do not make a habit of attempting psycho-sexual readings of the behavior of those with whom I disagree, I will not comment on the bizarre media fixation on a certain science fiction novel that forms the basis for comments like these:
Similar examples could be multiplied infinitely. But this bickering is pointless.

The Barrett Death Star is fully operational. The vacancy is there. The nomination has been made. Republicans have the votes, and on Oct. 22, ACB will be confirmed as the 115th Justice of the Supreme Court.

I for one will rejoice.


[The Week]
[WAPO]
[Right-Wing Watch]

Tuesday, March 17, 2020

WAPO - Okay Okay Fine, DJT Didn't Dissolve the Pandemic Response Team Like We Said After All.


For weeks now, the anti-Trump media has been beating their drum and saying the White House used to have a “pandemic response team” and that DJT in a fit of stupidity got rid of it. Because hey, we never have pandemics! Who needs them?  This has been shouted thousands of times over the course of the past weeks by the soft skulls on the tweeter, from major newspapers to fake cable news networks, and in every Democrat campaign rally.

It turns out this story originated with an op-ed in the Washington Post written by one Elizabeth Cameron, who ran the White House pandemic office under Barky Obama. Some sort of change was made to her former domain when the Trump Administration took over and Cameron was apparently butthurt DJT touched it. So she fired the off a shot that Democrats and their media leg humpers have been riffing off ever since.

Just One Problem: It’s not true.....

Silly Rabbit. Very few elements of government are ever disbanded, and it always seems a little suspect to believe that had happened in this case. What does happen, just like in the business world is that areas of responsibility are shifted, the names of things are changed and sometimes resources are redirected. Sometimes an independent entity is deemed better housed in a more established agency, not “disbanded” or “dissolved”, just moved down the hall or changed form. Happens all the time. 

Tim Morrison, former senior director for counter-proliferation and bio-defense on the National Security Council, felt compelled to offer the Post a rebuttal piece. Morrison was there and knew exactly what happened, and while I’m sure they were reluctant to do it, the Post allowed Morrison to correct the record:
"It is true that the Trump administration has seen fit to shrink the NSC staff. But the bloat that occurred under the previous administration clearly needed a correction. 
As The Post reported in 2015, from the Clinton administration to the Obama administration’s second term, the NSC’s staff “had quadrupled in size, to nearly 400 people.” That is why Trump began streamlining the NSC staff in 2017. One such move at the NSC was to create the counterproliferation and biodefense directorate, which was the result of consolidating three directorates into one. 
It is this reorganization that critics have misconstrued or intentionally misrepresented. If anything, the combined directorate was stronger because related expertise could be commingled."
SO,  the pandemic response team wasn’t dissolved at all. It was reorganized to be more efficient and allow the true experts to have a clearer path to offer their expertise to the president. The Elizabeth Cameron piece that started this whole narrative was either a complete lie or the work of a person who didn’t know as much as she thought she did about what was really going on. Either way it should have been fact-checked. 

So now that the record has been corrected does anyone really think the original narrative is going to fade away? Do you really think Democrats are going to stop running around claiming DJT “dissolved the pandemic response team” just because it’s patently false? Of course they won’t, which is why it’s irresponsible for the Washington Post to public claims like this in the first place.

They allowed a disgruntled former Obama official to publish a baseless hit piece, and that created a narrative that will long outlast the correction of the record they published yesterday. This is how nonsense takes hold in our political discourse. A lie can get halfway around the world before the truth gets its shoes on. Especially when the media are willing to help give the lie a head start

[WAPO] 
[Dan Calabrese]
[DGR] 
~ Thank You MJA@IOTWReport for the linkage! ~

Thursday, October 3, 2019

Looks Like Dems Are Gonna Need a Bigger Can of Turd Polish

News that Washington didn’t tell Ukraine it was delaying aid until a month after the President's phone call to its leader punches a gaping hole in Dems' impeachment case. The Ukraine President believed the military funding was already granted to Kiev when he spoke with DJA in August. Dems are charging the DJT held up the money to pressure Zelensky to probe Joe Biden and his son. Hard to see how that works when Zelensky didn’t know about the aid holdup, but hey, the media got it out there.

This follows the awkward fact that several of the whistleblower’s other claims about that call aren’t borne out by the transcript. Then the case grew fishier still when the New York Times reported that the whistleblower first consulted with a Schiff aide, who suggested he file a complaint. (and if you believe Schiff was at a distance on this point, I have a talking frog to sell you).  Add in Thursdays nine hours of testimony behind closed doors that turned out to be another smelly turd on the dems front porch.  Fact is, this is really starting to look as meatless as the “Russian collusion” fairy tale which explains why Schiff is bringing back a familiar fallback, warning that any resistance to Congress’ demands for testimony or documents counts as “evidence” of obstruction of justice. It's becoming quite obvious that dems pulled the trigger on impeachment before they had the goods.

This attempt is truly desperate: poorly planned from the beginning, and so poorly executed that every one of the conspirators, especially Adam Schiff, CNN’s Fredo Cuomo and Jake Tapper, MSNBC’s Ricky Maddow and Larry O’Donnell sound like used car salesman with one day left to hit their monthly quota.

Breitbart has a list of '11 facts that have already unraveled the Ukraine Hoax'.


~ Thank You WHATFINGER NEWS for the Linkage! ~

Wednesday, September 25, 2019

Why the Democrats Have Gone Insane


Impeach! Impeach, they say! If only he were Buckingham, they would take off his head as well. Trump has become the Democrats' version of Richard III, if he wasn't already.

Why have the Democrats, to put it bluntly, gone berserk? Why are they risking a backlash of cosmic proportions (other than appeasing their psychotically-inflamed base, of course)? One, distraction. They live in absolute fear of the coming revelations about the Russia probe, from Inspector General Horowitz but even more from the DOJ's John Durham, who can actually put people in jail. The Dems know -- if they have a brain (and a few do) -- these revelations are likely to point up the line at the leaders of the Democratic Party all the way to President Obama. They were all involved to one degree or another with illegally spying on or undermining Trump and his administration and supporters before and after the election. The extent of this we are only beginning to understand. To put it mildly, not good.

Whether you call this treason is up to you, but you can be sure Middle America (i. e. those elusive independent voters) will not appreciate it. But there's something worse -- and Pelosi's knows it. The only hope for Democrats to defeat Trump is, remote and quixotic as it may be, impeachment. In the midst of the current brouhaha, Joe Biden -- their great (alas white male) hope -- is being exposed as not just a senile plagiarist, but a senile, corrupt plagiarist with a freaky family out of a Southern gothic novel with tentacles reaching into China and Ukraine. Again, not good. Unfortunately, the rest of the Dems have tacked so far to the left that they wouldn't be able to win an election in Shenyang. - Roger Simon


Thursday, March 7, 2019

Elijah's Cumming for Your Seat Mr. Governor


You’ll probably remember the lovely, and  robust Stacey Abrams, the socialist Democrat who ran for governor of Georgia despite owing nearly $200,000 in back taxes and having no executive experience to speak of, who lost her election to Republican Brian Kemp by almost 55,000 votes. You’ll probably also remember that Abrams put on a sore loser act that would shame even Al Gore, refusing to concede the election and proceeding to start a “voting rights” group to fight “voter suppression” like that she continues to allege.

Well this week the Democrats in charge of the U.S. House of Representatives, in the person of House Oversight Committee Chairman Elijah "Bullet Head" Cummings, who reps for the Baltimore ghetto, announced Wednesday the dems were launching an investigation into allegations of voter suppression in Georgia. Bullet Head and crew are demanding the receipts to the election Brian Kemp stuffed in his pants and walked off with when he thought no one was looking. You see, Kemp was also the Georgia secretary of state. And he's white.

Now Georgia, like other states,  has “use it or lose it” laws, which means if you go a long time without voting they’ll put you on “unverified” status and if you turn up at the polls you’ll need to SHOW A VOTER ID to vote. That’s a measure designed to PREVENT VOTER FRAUD and it’s a sensible one. But this is known as “voter suppression,” according to today’s Democrat Party. Heaven forbid we try and have a free and fair election where a vote cast is a vote counted, not cancelled out by fraud. 

But If you’re looking to send people from precinct to precinct to stack ballot boxes it’s a lot easier to avoid getting caught if they’re voting for people who never show up, and when somebody who hasn’t voted in 10 years turns out to vote it’s often a decent bet there is some democrat voter fraudin' goin' on somewheres.

SOMEWHERE

There were also Voter registrations that were not processed because of voter information did not match, like residence or age. This is to PREVENT VOTER FRAUD. It was done in accordance with state law. Stacey Abrams understood from the get-go that she'd never win if she relied on "habitual voters," so she worked hard to inspire and mobilize so-called "low propensity" voters, or as they are sometime call elsewhere, dead people.

Jim Jordan, the ranking Republican member on House Oversight had this to say:
“It’s highly unusual for a Congressional Committee to involve itself in a state’s election. This is squarely in the purview of the state of Georgia, not the House Oversight Committee. We can’t help but think that attempts by the Democrats to insert the Committee into the state’s business is an attempt to relitigate an election result that they do not like.”
And we’re now going to have a knock-down, drag-out fight in the House Oversight Committee over whether any attempts to police the voter rolls or keep elections honest are evidence of bigotry and so on.

(The Hayride)
(That Whiny Leftist Website That Shall Remain Unnamed) 


~ Thank You WHATFINGER NEWS  and MJA@IOTWReport for the Linkage! ~

Monday, March 4, 2019

As Expected, He Never Had Anything


For two years now Sleazy Shitweasel Adam Schiff (D-CA) has claimed he was sitting on incontrovertible evidence that the Trump campaign colluded with the Russians to steal the 2016 election. He has never delivered on his claim, and of course the media never called him to account for his bluster. But the pressure is on now, because the Mueller investigation is about to wrap up and it’s not going to show any evidence of collusion. That’s going to leave Schiff, as chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, to either explain his earlier claim that he had this so-called evidence of collusion, or pick up the probe as a committee matter. His method of dealing with that? This.
Rep. Adam Schiff, the chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, said Sunday there’s “direct evidence” of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia and he won’t let up on digging into Trump’s finances.
“I think there is direct evidence in the e-mails from the Russians through their intermediary offering dirt on Hillary Clinton as part of what is described in writing as the Russian government effort to help elect Donald Trump,” Schiff told CBS’s “Face the Nation.”
So let’s recap: pencil neck was all over the news shows claiming he had direct evidence of collusion, but he wouldn’t say what it was and now that he’s getting asked about it again and he has to say something so he claims the “direct evidence” of which he’s been in possession for two years was nothing more than e-mails concerning a meeting everyone else in the world already knew about.

It’s not illegal to seek dirt on your political opponent from a Sexy Russian lady, and we’ve been over this before. So why does Schiff’s statement matter now? It matters because he needs to come up with a rationale for initiating a new committee probe after Mueller’s is done. Supposedly this big, incontrovertible evidence that he’d been sitting on for two years was going to provide that rationale. But it turns out the only thing he had was his own personal suspicion based on the same media narratives we’ve all been aware of for a very long time. He has no particular information the rest of us don’t have, and the rest of us don’t have anything that warrants continuing to investigate this once Mueller has wrapped things up. It’s too bad there isn’t some way to make this scumbag pay a price for this nonsense.....


~ Thank You WHATFINGER NEWS for the Linkage! ~

Wednesday, November 28, 2018

About That Guardian "Bombshell".....


I have to preface this link by saying I’m skeptical. The sourcing is very thin, and one of the writers has a very.... uh....dubious history: Manafort held secret talks with Assange in Ecuadorian embassy, sources say.
"Donald Trump’s former campaign manager Paul Manafort held secret talks with Julian Assange inside the Ecuadorian embassy in London, and visited around the time he joined Trump’s campaign, the Guardian has been told. Sources have said Manafort went to see Assange in 2013, 2015 and in spring 2016 – during the period when he was made a key figure in Trump’s push for the White House."
For what it’s worth, and that’s probably not much, both Assange and Manafort have vehemently denied this report. Manafort's statement:
 "This story is totally false and deliberately libelous. I have never met Julian Assange or anyone connected to him. I have never been contacted by anyone connected to Wikileaks, either directly or indirectly.  I have never reached out to Assange or Wikileaks on any matter. We are considering all legal options against the Guardian who proceeded with this story even after being notified by my representatives that it was false.” - Aaron Blake@Tweeter 
I should say now, I could care less about Paul Manafort. He's part of the opportunist, greasy underbelly of politics, and probably guilty of something or other, and Mueller knows it.

And that dubious history I mentioned above? One of the authors of the Guardian piece, Luke Harding, once claimed that the NSA hacked into his computer and for weeks, as he worked on a book about Edward Snowden, deleted text as he was writing it, causing his keyboard to start “flashing and bleeping.”

I tend to think this is part of a disinformation ruse. As the embassy Assange is holed up in is under Surveillance 24/7 by numerous sources for sure, let them show the video proof if he did visit. So unless this incendiary report is corroborated by someone who doesn’t have a flashing, bleeping keyboard, I’m going to take all this with a shaker full of salt.

Thursday, October 11, 2018

Mugging America in Broad Open Daylight


After the sanctuary city of San Francisco expanded voting to illegal aliens in some local elections, desperate California lefties now want to fraudulently boost its Congressional representation and federal funding by continuing to include illegal aliens in their census. Now leading the charge is none other than the disgraced Senator San Fran Feinstein herself, who seems confused by the fact those of us who are citizens might not want people from other countries vote on who represents us. Surprised?


As we wrote in March: 
The Commerce Department confirmed  that the 2020 census will ask respondents if they are U.S. citizens or not. On the face of it, that’s a pretty innocuous question. It was used until 1950 but was part of the short form starting in 1910 until its removal in 2010 after the dems and Barky Obama got their clocked cleaned big time in the mid terms and lost an historic number of seats.  But the lefties now believe that beneath the surface it’s part of a vile Trump style voter suppression move. 

New York City, who continues to coddle illegal aliens and defy Federal law, created a “NYC-ID” card that was meant to help undocumented illegal aliens with a card for identification, health care, and governmental services (you can bet there's no hanky-panky going on there) all payed for with New Yorker's hard earned tax money. 

Vanita Gupta, a former Obama toadie and president & CEO of the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights (they do love to give themselves names with Civil and Human Rights in the title don't they) said that “there is already data that the heightened level of fear among Latino populations, created by the Trump administration’s hostile policies and rhetoric and could depress their participation in the 2020 census. You mean a heightened level of fear because They Are Here Illegally?!


The results according to experts means less power for Democrats. Under-counting of Latino populations, which will in turn affect government services, budgets, and voter rolls. No, they shouldn't be accounted for in 
government services & budgets. They Illegally Entered the Country!!  Non-citizens can’t vote, (yeah, you keep sayin' that BS ) but they are still counted for congressional districts and state congressional representation, which they shouldn't be because They're Here Illegally! 


It’s quite possible that California will lose one or more of its seats in the House of Representatives if enough illegals don’t respond to the census, so says the California Attorney General. This is also particularly galling to snowflake progressives because the 2020 census will also not count how many LGBT queers there are in America, mainly because they are counting heads, not sexual orientations... and no one really cares!! 


(BSI)
(Times-Picayune)

Thank You WHATFINGER NEWS &
MJA@IOTWReport for the Linkage!

Sunday, April 8, 2018

Joe Biden Boasts of Keeping 'Brilliant Judge' Off Supreme Court


NewsBusters:

"More than 30 years after a relentless campaign of character assassination kept Robert Bork from a seat on the Supreme Court, one of the architects of that attack is belatedly crediting its target for his brilliance. Appearing on the podcast 'Pod Save America' Joe Biden revisited his role in derailing Bork's nomination to the court in 1987 while Biden was chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee.
"I'm the guy that kept there from being a guy who was maybe the most brilliant conservative who was nominated for the Supreme Court (Favreau snickers) and I kept him off the court. And I was able to ... in the Judiciary Committee (to) defeat (Clarence) Thomas (nominated by the elder Bush four years later). Bork got flat defeated. Thomas got defeated in committee. But the Constitution says the Senate shall advise and consent, not a committee shall advise and consent. And one of the reasons why I think the president didn't picked the man we picked who was a really good guy, remember, some liberals were angry we didn't pick somebody way left, because the Constitution as written says the Senate has as much right to determine who is on the court as the president does. It says the president can propose, the Senate disposes."
As is his wont, Biden lets the cat out of the bag. The biggest problem for liberals when it came to Bork was not his originalist views of the Constitution, or that he pulled the trigger for Nixon in the so-called Saturday Night Massacre, but the fact that he was brilliant and could be expected to push the court to the right for generations to come -- hence he had to be destroyed.

How seemingly gracious of Biden to acknowledge Bork as legal exemplar, albeit long after it mattered and seeing how it is now beyond dispute." - Read More
___________________________________________________________________

It's worth noting that Judge Robert Bork's months-long nomination battle in 1987 roughly aligned with Biden's first doomed run for the presidency which ended amid growing evidence of his lack of integrity for plagiarizing remarks from other politicians. Also leading the charge against Bork that year was the womanizing drunken douche bag, Senator Ted Kennedy.


* Thank You MJA for the Linkage!